DEPARTMENT OF OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY
Bachelor	TR-NQF-HE: Level 6	QF-EHEA: First Cycle	EQF-LLL: Level 6

Ders Genel Tanıtım Bilgileri

Course Code:

5010003079

Ders İsmi:

Art in Public Space

Ders Yarıyılı:

Spring
Fall

Ders Kredileri:

Theoretical	Practical	Credit	ECTS
2		2	3

Language of instruction:

Ders Koşulu:

Ders İş Deneyimini Gerektiriyor mu?:

Yes

Type of course:

Üniversite Seçmeli

Course Level:

Bachelor

TR-NQF-HE:6. Master`s Degree

QF-EHEA:First Cycle

EQF-LLL:6. Master`s Degree

Mode of Delivery:

E-Learning

Course Coordinator :

Öğr.Gör. Erkan KOLAT

Course Lecturer(s):

Dr.Öğr.Üyesi Filiz DOĞAN

Course Assistants:

Dersin Amaç ve İçeriği

Course Objectives:	This course teaches students the contemporary and emerging art of public space
Course Content:	In this course, art in public space will be introduced with examples from past to present, contemporary art approaches and artists will be included. The subjects to be taught during this course include the definition of space and its historical process, the relationship of art with public space, art movements in the public space, etc. have topics

Learning Outcomes

The students who have succeeded in this course;

Learning Outcomes

1 - Knowledge
Theoretical - Conceptual
1) Learns the definitions of space.
2) Recognize the past and our art approaches.
3) Gains information about art movements in the public sphere.
4) Gains information about the contemporary approach in public space.
2 - Skills
Cognitive - Practical
3 - Competences
Communication and Social Competence
Learning Competence
1) Express the place of art in public space
2) Learns the relationship between open space and art with current and developing paintings.
3) Learns the relationship of art with the common area.
4) Learns their colors, psychology and application examples suitable for their purpose in the public sphere.
Field Specific Competence
Competence to Work Independently and Take Responsibility

Ders Akış Planı

Week	Subject	Related Preparation
1)
2)
3)
4)
5)
6)
7)
8)
9)
10)
11)
12)
13)
14)
15)
16)

Sources

Course Notes / Textbooks:

References:

• Altıntaş, Osman; Eliri, İsa. (2012), “Birey Toplum İlişkisinde Kent Kültürü, Kamusal Alan ve Onda Şekillenen Sanat Olgusu”, İdil Sanat ve Dil Dergisi, Cilt: 1, Sayı: 5, Volume: 1, Number: 5, s.s. 61-74.
• Bayram, B., 2007. Kamusal Mekan Kalitesinin Yükseltilmesinde Yöntemler ve Kamusal Sanatın Rolü, Yüksek Lisans Tezi, ĠTÜ Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, İstanbul.
• Carr,S., Francıs, M., Rivling, L.G. ve Stone, A.M., 1992, Public Spaces, Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge.
• Çağlın, Pınar. (2010), “Kamusal Sanat ve Kent İlişkisi”, Yayımlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi, İstanbul Teknik Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Disiplinlerarası Anabilim Dalı Kentsel Tasarım Programı: İstanbul.
• Çevik, N. Bingöl, M. Ve Durmuş, T. Kamusal Alan Bağlamında Kentsel Mekanlarda Çağdaş Sanat Yansımaları” Fine Arts, ISSN: 1308-7290 (NWSAFA), 2019
• Doğanay, Gizem (2015). Kamusal Alanda Cam Heykel, Mimar Sinan Güzel Sanatlar Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Seramik Ve Cam Tasarımı Anasanat Dalı Seramik Tasarımı Programı, Yüksek Lisans Tezi
• Ercan, Halil Fazıl. (2018). Kamusal Açık Alanlarda Sanat ve Battalgazi Çınar Park Örneği. İnönü Üniversitesi Sanat ve Tasarım Dergisi. ISSN: 1309-9876. E-ISSN: 1309- 9884. s. 44-57.
• Erdal, G., (2013). Ambalajın Dili ve Psikolojik Etkisi, Akademik Bakış Dergisi, Sayı: 35, Uluslararası Hakemli Sosyal Bilimler E-Dergisi, İktisat ve Girişimcilik Üniversitesi, Türk Dünyası Kırgız Türk Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, s. 7, Celalabat, Kırgızistan
• Ertürk, S. (1983). Mimari mekânların algılanması üzerine deneysel bir çalışma. Yayınlanmış doktora tezi, Karadeniz Teknik Üniversitesi, Trabzon.
• Gadsby, J.M., (1995). Looking at the Writing on the Wall: A Critical Review and Taxonomy of Graffiti Texts.
• Görgülü, E. (2017). JR’ın Inside Out Projesindeki Portreler ve Kamusal Sanat. Medeniyet Sanat Dergisi, C. 3, S. 2, s.167-186.
• Güneş, S. (2009). Sokak Sanatı. İstanbul: Artes Yayınları.
• Hauser, A., 1984, Sanatın toplumsal tarihi, çev.Yıldız Gölönü, Remzi Kitapevi, İstanbul.
• Hubbard, P., Faire, L., Lilley, K., 2003, Memorials to modernity public art in the city of future, Landscape Design, Volume 28
• Kent, F., Davies, S., Khacadurian, A., Madden, K., 2001, How to turn a place around, Project for Public Places Inc., Newyork.
• Lang, J., 1994, Urban Design:The American Experience, Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York.
• Madden, K., 2001, How to Turn a Place Around, A handbook for creating successful public spaces. project for public spaces, edited by: Andrew Schwartez.
• Martel, C.(1995). Ben Enerjiyim, Arion Yayınevi, s. 85,İstanbul.
• Oktay, D., 1999, Kentsel Ortak Mekanların Niteliği ve Kent Yaşantısındaki Rolü, Yapı Dergisi, 207, s.54-61, İstanbul.
• Öztürk, Ö. (2007). Kentsel Kimlik Oluşumunda Güzel Sanatların Yeri: İzmir Örneği (Yayımlanmış Yüksek Lisans Tezi). Ankara Üniversitesi, Ankara.
• Paumier, C.B., Dimond, C.C. ve Rich, D.P., 1988, Designing the Successful Downtown, The Urban Land Institute, Columbia.
• Sanatblog, (2015). Jr İstanbul’da: Şehrin Kırışıklıkları. http://www.sanatblog.com/jristanbulda-sehrin-kirisikliklari/
• Sheilk, S. (2005), Anstelle der Öffentlichkeit? Oder: Die Welt in Franfmenten, (Kamusal Alanın Yerine Ne mi? Ya da, Parçalardan Oluşan Dünya), Kritik der Kreativiat, yay. Haz. Gerald Raunig ve Ulf Wuggenig, Viyana.
• Stone, N.J., (2003). Environmental view and color for a simulated telemarketing task, Journal of Environmental Psychology. 23(1), 63-78.
• Stone, N.J., English, A.J. (1998). Task type, posters, and workspace color on modd, satisfaction and performance. Journal of Environmental Psychology. 18, 175-185.
• Susuz, Mehmet. (2017), “Göstergebilim Bağlamında Tüketim Kültürü ve Sanat: Enstalasyon”, Yayımlanmamış Doktora Tezi, Ondokuz Mayıs Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü Güzel Sanatlar Eğitimi Anabilim Dalı Resim-İş Eğitimi Bilim Dalı: Samsun.
• Uçar, T. F. (2004). Görsel iletişim ve Grafik Tasarım, İnkılap Yayınları, İstanbul.
• Varol, E., 2004. İnsan Çevre Etkileşimi Açısından Kamusal Mekanda Sanatın Rolü, Yüksek Lisans Tezi, İTÜ Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, İstanbul.
• Veryeri-Alaca, Ilgım. (2008). Louıse Bourgeoıs’nın Sanatının Kronolojik Dönüşümü. Ç.Ü. Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, Cilt 17, Sayı 3, 2008, s.1-16
• Woolley, H., 2003, Urban Open Spaces, Spon Press, London.

Ders - Program Öğrenme Kazanım İlişkisi

Ders Öğrenme Kazanımları	1	2	4	7	3	5	6	8
Program Outcomes
1) Has the basic medical knowledge required for evaluations and interventions in the field of ergotherapy.
2) Biopsychosocially evaluates the needs of the person, plans and conducts occupational therapy interventions.
3) Makes occupational therapy applications in order to achieve the most independent level in life activities within the skill and possibilities of the person.
4) It carries out its professional practices within an ethical framework.
5) It makes necessary home, work and social environment arrangements for the independence of the person.
6) It evaluates the person as person-centered and plans her/his interventions accordingly.
7) It works to eliminate the obstacles related to the adaptation of the person to business life and social life.
8) It works in harmony with the multidisciplinary team and makes applications related to occupational therapy.
9) Follows scientific developments related to ergotherapy, constantly updates their knowledge and is open to lifelong learning.
10) Contributes to social arrangements by collaborating with individuals, communities and stakeholders.
11) It respects people's physical, social, cultural and economic differences.
12) Participates in professional, scientific and social meetings, takes an active role in the development and promotion of the occupational therapy profession.
13) Has the ability to develop and execute projects related to occupational therapy field.
14) She/he knows English enough to follow scientific publications.
15) As an occupational therapist, she/he takes responsibility for all her treatments and studies.

Ders - Öğrenme Kazanımı İlişkisi

No Effect	1 Lowest	2 Low	3 Average	4 High	5 Highest

	Program Outcomes	Level of Contribution
1)	Has the basic medical knowledge required for evaluations and interventions in the field of ergotherapy.
2)	Biopsychosocially evaluates the needs of the person, plans and conducts occupational therapy interventions.
3)	Makes occupational therapy applications in order to achieve the most independent level in life activities within the skill and possibilities of the person.
4)	It carries out its professional practices within an ethical framework.
5)	It makes necessary home, work and social environment arrangements for the independence of the person.
6)	It evaluates the person as person-centered and plans her/his interventions accordingly.
7)	It works to eliminate the obstacles related to the adaptation of the person to business life and social life.
8)	It works in harmony with the multidisciplinary team and makes applications related to occupational therapy.
9)	Follows scientific developments related to ergotherapy, constantly updates their knowledge and is open to lifelong learning.
10)	Contributes to social arrangements by collaborating with individuals, communities and stakeholders.
11)	It respects people's physical, social, cultural and economic differences.
12)	Participates in professional, scientific and social meetings, takes an active role in the development and promotion of the occupational therapy profession.
13)	Has the ability to develop and execute projects related to occupational therapy field.
14)	She/he knows English enough to follow scientific publications.
15)	As an occupational therapist, she/he takes responsibility for all her treatments and studies.

Öğrenme Etkinliği ve Öğretme Yöntemleri

Anlatım
Bireysel çalışma ve ödevi
Course
Grup çalışması ve ödevi
Homework
Soru cevap/ Tartışma
Uygulama (Modelleme, Tasarım, Maket, Simülasyon, Deney vs.)
Web Tabanlı Öğrenme

Ölçme ve Değerlendirme Yöntemleri ve Kriterleri

Homework

Assessment & Grading

Semester Requirements	Number of Activities	Level of Contribution
Homework Assignments	4	% 30
Midterms	1	% 30
Semester Final Exam	1	% 40
total		% 100
PERCENTAGE OF SEMESTER WORK		% 60
PERCENTAGE OF FINAL WORK		% 40
total		% 100

İş Yükü ve AKTS Kredisi Hesaplaması

Activities	Number of Activities	Duration (Hours)	Workload
Course Hours	0	2	0
Homework Assignments	4	2	8
Midterms	1	2	2
Final	1	2	2
Total Workload			12