| Week |
Subject |
Related Preparation |
| 1) |
Definition of growth and development
|
1)C.Garel ve ark.-MRI of the Fetal Brain:Normal Development and Cerebral Pathologies,2004.
2)C.O’Brien-Normal and Impaired Motor Development,1994.
3)Craig GJ, Baucum D; Human Development, Prentice Hall, Pearson Education, Inc;2002. |
| 2) |
Development overview
|
1)C.Garel ve ark.-MRI of the Fetal Brain:Normal Development and Cerebral Pathologies,2004.
2)C.O’Brien-Normal and Impaired Motor Development,1994.
3)Craig GJ, Baucum D; Human Development, Prentice Hall, Pearson Education, Inc;2002. |
| 3) |
Factors affecting movement development
|
1)C.Garel ve ark.-MRI of the Fetal Brain:Normal Development and Cerebral Pathologies,2004.
2)C.O’Brien-Normal and Impaired Motor Development,1994.
3)Craig GJ, Baucum D; Human Development, Prentice Hall, Pearson Education, Inc;2002. |
| 4) |
Motor control and motor learning
|
1)C.Garel ve ark.-MRI of the Fetal Brain:Normal Development and Cerebral Pathologies,2004.
2)C.O’Brien-Normal and Impaired Motor Development,1994.
3)Craig GJ, Baucum D; Human Development, Prentice Hall, Pearson Education, Inc;2002. |
| 5) |
Development and motor control theories
|
1)C.Garel ve ark.-MRI of the Fetal Brain:Normal Development and Cerebral Pathologies,2004.
2)C.O’Brien-Normal and Impaired Motor Development,1994.
3)Craig GJ, Baucum D; Human Development, Prentice Hall, Pearson Education, Inc;2002. |
| 6) |
Reflexes |
1)C.Garel ve ark.-MRI of the Fetal Brain:Normal Development and Cerebral Pathologies,2004.
2)C.O’Brien-Normal and Impaired Motor Development,1994.
3)Craig GJ, Baucum D; Human Development, Prentice Hall, Pearson Education, Inc;2002. |
| 7) |
Midterm Exam |
|
| 8) |
0-2 years motor development
|
1)C.Garel ve ark.-MRI of the Fetal Brain:Normal Development and Cerebral Pathologies,2004.
2)C.O’Brien-Normal and Impaired Motor Development,1994.
3)Craig GJ, Baucum D; Human Development, Prentice Hall, Pearson Education, Inc;2002. |
| 9) |
2-6 years of motor development
|
1)C.Garel ve ark.-MRI of the Fetal Brain:Normal Development and Cerebral Pathologies,2004.
2)C.O’Brien-Normal and Impaired Motor Development,1994.
3)Craig GJ, Baucum D; Human Development, Prentice Hall, Pearson Education, Inc;2002. |
| 10) |
Development of upper extremity function
|
1)C.Garel ve ark.-MRI of the Fetal Brain:Normal Development and Cerebral Pathologies,2004.
2)C.O’Brien-Normal and Impaired Motor Development,1994.
3)Craig GJ, Baucum D; Human Development, Prentice Hall, Pearson Education, Inc;2002. |
| 11) |
Development of hand function
|
1)C.Garel ve ark.-MRI of the Fetal Brain:Normal Development and Cerebral Pathologies,2004.
2)C.O’Brien-Normal and Impaired Motor Development,1994.
3)Craig GJ, Baucum D; Human Development, Prentice Hall, Pearson Education, Inc;2002. |
| 12) |
Movement and function development in the elderly
|
1)C.Garel ve ark.-MRI of the Fetal Brain:Normal Development and Cerebral Pathologies,2004.
2)C.O’Brien-Normal and Impaired Motor Development,1994.
3)Craig GJ, Baucum D; Human Development, Prentice Hall, Pearson Education, Inc;2002. |
| 13) |
Development of skills necessary for activity in children
|
1)C.Garel ve ark.-MRI of the Fetal Brain:Normal Development and Cerebral Pathologies,2004.
2)C.O’Brien-Normal and Impaired Motor Development,1994.
3)Craig GJ, Baucum D; Human Development, Prentice Hall, Pearson Education, Inc;2002. |
| 14) |
Physical and psychosocial factors affecting development
|
1)C.Garel ve ark.-MRI of the Fetal Brain:Normal Development and Cerebral Pathologies,2004.
2)C.O’Brien-Normal and Impaired Motor Development,1994.
3)Craig GJ, Baucum D; Human Development, Prentice Hall, Pearson Education, Inc;2002. |
| 15) |
General discussion
|
1)C.Garel ve ark.-MRI of the Fetal Brain:Normal Development and Cerebral Pathologies,2004.
2)C.O’Brien-Normal and Impaired Motor Development,1994.
3)Craig GJ, Baucum D; Human Development, Prentice Hall, Pearson Education, Inc;2002. |
| 16) |
Finals |
|
| |
Program Outcomes |
Level of Contribution |
| 1) |
Has the basic medical knowledge required for evaluations and interventions in the field of ergotherapy. |
4 |
| 2) |
Biopsychosocially evaluates the needs of the person, plans and conducts occupational therapy interventions. |
2 |
| 3) |
Makes occupational therapy applications in order to achieve the most independent level in life activities within the skill and possibilities of the person. |
2 |
| 4) |
It carries out its professional practices within an ethical framework. |
1 |
| 5) |
It makes necessary home, work and social environment arrangements for the independence of the person. |
2 |
| 6) |
It evaluates the person as person-centered and plans her/his interventions accordingly. |
3 |
| 7) |
It works to eliminate the obstacles related to the adaptation of the person to business life and social life. |
2 |
| 8) |
It works in harmony with the multidisciplinary team and makes applications related to occupational therapy. |
1 |
| 9) |
Follows scientific developments related to ergotherapy, constantly updates their knowledge and is open to lifelong learning. |
2 |
| 10) |
Contributes to social arrangements by collaborating with individuals, communities and stakeholders. |
1 |
| 11) |
It respects people's physical, social, cultural and economic differences. |
3 |
| 12) |
Participates in professional, scientific and social meetings, takes an active role in the development and promotion of the occupational therapy profession. |
2 |
| 13) |
Has the ability to develop and execute projects related to occupational therapy field. |
2 |
| 14) |
She/he knows English enough to follow scientific publications. |
1 |
| 15) |
As an occupational therapist, she/he takes responsibility for all her treatments and studies. |
1 |
BİLGİ PAKETİ / DERS KATALOĞU
